MESIR AND THE TRAGEDY – PART 1

What has happened to the mighty nation of Mesir? Mesir is the nation which is mentioned in the Quran. Prophet Musa was born in Mesir and once upon a time Mesir was ruled by the mighty Pharaohs. University of Al-Azhar is located in Mesir. Since more than one thousand years ago University Al-Azhar is already existed in Mesir when there were no other universities existed in this world. There are thousands of Muslims scholars and philosophers who have graduated from Al-Azhar University. University Al-Azhar has been the centre of Islamic teaching in the world for more than one thousand years. Now, Mesir is in a tragedy. What is the tragedy which has inflicted the nation of Mesir? The Muslims are killing other Muslims. How such a tragedy could ever take place in the country where there are many Muslims scholars and philosophers. What are the wrong actions of the peoples of Mesir which make such calamities to descend in Mesir? The political problem which is currently faced by the peoples of Mesir is a very serious political problem. Allah gives us problems because of our wrong actions. How could our problems be solved? Our problem could be solved when we do good actions. International communities and the President of the United States of America are not able to solve the political problem of Mesir. The political problems of Mesir can be solved only by the peoples of Mesir?
What are the problems in Mesir? Mesir is currently having the problems of leadership. The current leader of Mesir is not accepted by all the peoples of Mesir and therefore he is not able to unite the peoples of Mesir. The peoples of Mesir are not united under President Muhammad Mursi. The peoples of Mesir are so divided to the extent they are even willing to kill each other. Unfortunately the two groups who are trying to kill each other are Muslims. How to solve our problems? In order to solve our problems we are first to know where are our problems come from? All our problems come from Allah. There is none able to give us problems except Allah. Bad or good only come from Allah. Allah is the One who gives us problems and Allah is the One who solves our problems. What is the rule which is used by Allah in order to give us problems or blessings? We run our country by following rules and similarly Allah also runs this universe by following rules. What is the rule which is used by Allah to give blessing or problems to men in this world? When the actions of men are good, Allah will give men blessings and the solutions to all the problems which are faced by men. When the actions of men are bad, Allah will give men many calamities or problems which men are not able to solve. Now there are many problems in Mesir which the peoples of Mesir are not able to solve. All the problems of Mesir come from Allah and Allah gives problems to Mesir because of the wrong actions of the peoples of Mesir.
What are the wrong actions of the peoples of Mesir? How the peoples of Mesir could ever do wrong actions when there are so many Muslims scholars or ulama in Mesir. Are not the actions of the many thousands of Muslims scholars in Mesir are good? Are not Islamic values known to the Muslims scholars of Mesir? Yes the Muslims scholars in Mesir know Islamic values but they do not have the Islamic values. In other words ,University Al-Azhar is only able to produce Muslims scholars who know about Islamic values but is not able to produce Muslims scholars who have the Islamic values. Islamic universities, madrasah and Islamic schools are able to produce only the Muslims who know about Islamic values but are not able to produce the Muslims who have the Islamic values. Many Muslims are deceived by the fact that Islamic universities, madrasah and Islamic schools are able to produce Muslims with Islamic values, when in reality they are only able to produce Muslims scholars who know about Islamic values but are not able to have the Islamic values. Although there are many Islamic universities, madrasah and Islamic schools in Mesir but all these Islamic institutions are able to produce only the Muslims scholars who know about Islamic values but are not able to have the Islamic values. When there are many Muslims who are without Islamic values in Mesir then there will be many problems in Mesir.
What are the wrong actions of the peoples of Mesir? The majority of the peoples of Mesir are Muslims Sunni. Muslims in Mesir as other Muslim are trying to solve their problems by correcting their situations and not by correcting their iman and actions. Mesir was colonized by the British and later was ruled by King Farouk. At the time of King Farouk there were also many problems in Mesir. At that time there were some Muslims in Mesir who believe that the problems in Mesir will only be solved if Mesir is ruled according to the Islamic laws. In order to be able to rule Mesir with Islamic laws the Muslims in Mesir established the political party in 1920 which is known as Ikhwan Muslimin or Muslims Brotherhood. The first leader of Muslims Brotherhood was Hassan Al-Bana who was a Muslim scholar of Mesir. The main aim of establishing Muslims Brotherhood is to take over the power to rule Mesir from the hand of those Muslims whom Muslims Brotherhood regarded as not the true Muslims. Muslims Brotherhood was established with the aim, to rule Mesir according to the Islamic laws. Hassan Al-Bana was a Muslim scholar who had the vision of establishing Mesir as an Islamic state. The idea of Hassan Al-Bana was also shared by many other Muslims scholars in this world. Among the Muslims scholars who have the same idea were Sheikh Syed Qutub of Mesir, Maulana Maududi of Pakistan, Maulana Hussein Madani of India and Sheikh Bediuzzamman of Turkey.
All these Muslims scholars believe that the problems of the Muslims in this world will only be solved when Muslims countries are ruled according to the Islamic laws. All the above Muslims scholars believe that it is the responsibility of all the Muslims in this world to establish an Islamic country. What is an Islamic country? According to them, an Islamic country is a country which is governed by the rules of Allah which are stated in the Quran. According to them the efforts to establish an Islamic state is known as Jihad and anyone who dies in the effort to establish an Islamic state is a martyr or syuhadah. There are many Muslims scholars and also Muslims in all over the world that follows the idea of Hassan Al-Bana. The most famous Muslims scholars in Malaysia who follow the idea of Hassan AL-Bana are Tuan Guru Nik Aziz and Tuan Guru Haji Hadi Awang. There are also Muslims who are not Islamic scholars but are also the followers of Hassan Al-Bana. Among the most notable follower of Hassan Al-Bana in Malaysia who is not a Muslim scholar is Dato’ Seri Anwar Ibrahim. In my opinion, Dato’ Seri Anwar Ibrahim is not the real follower of Hassan Al-Bana because later he did join UMNO and became the Deputy President of UMNO. The true follower of Hassan Al-Bana will never join such political organization as UMNO which make race and not Islam as the basis of their organization.
In my opinion Dato Seri Anwar Ibrahim is only a politician similar to Datuk Seri Najib but mistakenly accepted by many Muslims in the world as a good Muslim worker who is working sincerely to establish Islam in Malaysia. Why there are many Muslims who believe Anwar Ibrahim is a good Muslim worker who is working sincerely to establish Islam in Malaysia? They believe Anwar Ibrahim is a good Muslim worker because Anwar Ibrahim was the founder and the first President of Abim. Abim is a Muslim Youth Organization of Malaysia which was established by Anwar Ibrahim. Abim is supposed to be an organization which is similar to Ikhwan Muslimin or Muslims Brotherhood of Mesir. If Anwar Ibrahim is the true follower of Hassan Al-Bana, he should not have joined UMNO because UMNO is a nationalist party. In my opinion when Anwar Ibrahim wanted to join UMNO, Tun Dr Mahathir should not have accepted him as the member of UMNO. In my opinion Tun Dr Mahathir who is supposed to be the most intelligent Prime Minister of Malaysia should have known that Anwar Ibrahim was a liar and not the true Islamic worker as Hassan Al-Bana and Syed Qutub. Unfortunate Anwar Ibrahim was clever than Tun Dr Mahathir and he was able even to deceive Tun Dr Mahathir into the believe that he was the true Islamic worker. In my opinion, the greatest mistake ever done by Tun Dr Mahathir as the Prime minister of Malaysia was to accept Anwar Ibrahim to join UMNO.
With the grace of Allah, Allah gave me the understanding that Anwar Ibrahim is not a true Islamic worker when Anwar joined UMNO in 1981. When Anwar joined UMNO in 1981, Allah gave me the understanding that Anwar Ibrahim is a shrewd politician. Why Anwar join UMNO? Anwar Ibrahim joined UMNO not because he wanted to revitalize UMNO from within but because he wanted to become the Prime Minister of Malaysia. Many people including Tun Dr Mahathir was deceived by Anwar Ibrahim. There are many parties and associations in this world which have the same ideas and principles as the Muslims Brotherhood of Mesir. As for examples, Parti Islam SeMalaysia or PAS, Abim or Angkatan Belia Islam Malaysia, Parti Sejahtera of Indonesia, Jamat Islami of Pakistan and Jamat Islami of Bangladesh are parties or associations which have the same ideas and principles as Muslims Brotherhood of Mesir. In my opinion, Hassan Al-Bana was among the most famous Muslims scholars in recent history who believe that it is obligatory or fardu for Muslims to establish an Islamic state. What is an Islamic state? An Islamic state is a country which is ruled by the Islamic laws. In order to execute the idea that it is fardu for Muslims to establish an Islamic state, the Muslims in Mesir under the leadership of Hassan Al-Bana establish Ikhwan Muslimin or Muslims Brotherhood in 1920. The Muslims Brotherhood of Mesir has made many attempts to rule Mesir. Many of their attempts to rule Mesir have failed and many of their leaders and thinkers were jailed and prosecuted or detained without trials by the government of Mesir.
When Gamal Nasir was the President of Mesir, Muslims Brotherhood was barred from entering politics. At the time when Gamal Nasir, Anuar Sadat and Hosni Mubarak become the President of Mesir there were many leaders of Muslims Brotherhood who were tortured, killed or jailed without trials. All the previous President of Mesir feared Muslims Brotherhood will become their political rival in Mesir and because of that Muslims Brotherhood was barred from entering politics. Muslims Brotherhood political activities were suppressed because Gamal Nasir, Anuar Sadat and Hosni Mubarak wanted to make Mesir a secular state while Muslims Brotherhood wanted to make Mesir an Islamic state. Similar situation also exist in Malaysia when UMNO wanted to make Malaysia a secular state while PAS wanted to make Malaysia an Islamic state. Both parties have different objectives and because of that they are antagonizing each other. The members of both parties are all Muslims but they become enemies to each other because they do not have the correct understanding of Islam. Although they have deviated from the correct path but they claimed that they are in the correct path. These are the main problems or dilemma of Muslims in all over the world. Muslims have dilemma because they do not understand the true meaning of the Quran and the Sunnah. They do not have the understanding of the Quran and the Sunnah because they do not do the work of inviting mankind to good and preventing mankind from evils. In my opinion all the followers of Muslims Brotherhood and also the followers of Gamal Nasir, Anuar Sadat and Hosni Mubarak are Muslims but they are Muslims who are deviated from the correct path. All the followers of Muslims Brotherhood and the followers of Gamal Nasir, Anuar Sadat and Hosni Mubarak are Muslims because all of them are reciting the Great Kalimah. In Islam, whoever has recited the Great Kalimah is a Muslim.
Who are better Muslims? There is no one knows who are better Muslims except Allah. In my opinion, Muslims in Muslims Brotherhood and the Muslims who are with Gamal Nasir, Anuar Sadat and Hosni Mubarak are also Muslims who have become deviated from the correct path. They have become deviated from the correct path because they are not doing one of the most important Sunnah of our Prophet Muhammad saw. Which of the most important Sunnah of Prophet Muhammad saw they have not done? Both the Muslims who are either with the Muslims Brotherhood or with Gamal Nasir, Anuar Sadat and Hosni Mubarak are not doing the Sunnah of inviting mankind to good and preventing mankind from evils the way done by Prophet Muhammad saw. What is the great mistake made by Muslims Brotherhood, PAS or Jamaat Islami? In my opinion the great mistake which is made by Muslims Brotherhood, PAS, Jamat Islami or Tabligh Jamaat is to regard Muslims who are not with their groups as either Kafir or non-Muslims, secular Muslims or deviated Muslims. In reality even the Muslims who are with Muslims Brotherhood, PAS, Jamat Islami or Tabligh Jamaat are deviated Muslims because as other Muslims they also have not done the Sunnah of inviting mankind to good and preventing mankind from evils as done by the Prophet Muhammad saw. However Muslim who are with Muslims Brotherhood, PAS, Jamat Islami and Tabligh Jamaat think that they are the true Muslims.
The followers of PAS in Malaysia believe that the Muslims who are with UMNO or Muslims who are supporting UMNO are Kafir or non-Muslims. This wrong belief will lead to wrong actions. The Muslims who have this belief are ready even to kill the Muslims who are not supporting their group because they regard the Muslims who are not supporting their group as non-Muslims and therefore the act of killing the non-Muslims who are against Muslims is an act of Jihad and to die on such actions is to die as a martyr. Mesir was originally ruled under a Monarchy system and the last monarch who ruled Mesir was King Farouk. The monarchy system was then replaced by a republic when a coup which was led by Gamal Nasir and supported by Muslims Brotherhood was able to overthrow King Farouk. Gamal Nasir promised Muslims Brotherhood that the power to rule Mesir with be shared with them but the promise was not fulfilled by Gamal Nasir. The coup had made Gamal Nasir to know the true strength and colours of Muslims Brotherhood and its potential to become his competitor in the struggle to win the power to rule Mesir. Gamal Nasir did not want Muslims Brotherhood to share the power with him to rule Mesir because he wanted to make Mesir a secular state. He wanted to exterminate Muslims Brotherhood as his competitor and during the time when Gamal Nasir was the President of Mesir, there were many of the leaders of the Muslims Brotherhood who had been killed or tortured by Gamal Nasir.
The tortures and the killing of the leaders of Muslims Brotherhood continue even to the time of President Anwar Sadat and Hosni Mubarak. Mesir has been ruled by the armies for more than six decades and the armies of Mesir have gained much influence in determining the political landscape of Mesir. When the revolution to overthrow the President of Tunisia had sparked in Tunisia, it has kindled a similar revolution in Mesir and Libya. All the revolutions in Tunisia, Libya and Mesir were aimed at overthrowing the dictators who had ruled their countries for so many decades. With the grace of Allah, the revolutions in Tunisia, Mesir and Libya were successful in overthrowing the dictators. These dictators were elected to become the President of their countries by the so call democratic systems which were designed by them in such a way that the winner of the election will always be the party of the President. In the name of democracy, they deceived the peoples and in this way they tried to maintain the power to rule the countries and to ensure that the power to rule these countries will always remain to be within their families. In reality these countries which were ruled by these dictators were not ruled by a government which was elected via the democratic system. In reality these countries were practicing a monarchy system. The armies in these countries have enjoyed many privileges when these dictators such as Gamal Nasir, Anuar Sadat and Hosni Mubarak were in power. When the peoples of Mesir were successful in overthrowing President Hosni Mubarak, it marked the end of dictatorship rule in Mesir. In 2012, for the first time, Mesir was holding the true general election to select her first President.
Prof Dr Nasoha Saabin
December 2013
Integrative Holistic Wellness Centre

Posted in POLITIC | Tagged | Leave a comment

MELAYU HILANG KUASA ~ Jika Pakatan Pembangkang Memerintah

UtusanMalaysia~ http://www.utusan.com.my/utusan/info.asp?y=2010&dt=0924&pub=Utusan_Malaysia&sec=Muka_Hadapan&pg=mh_01.htm
Untuk memastikan supaya terus berkuasa memerintah di Malaysia, orang melayu yang merupakan penganut agama islam mesti bersatu. Apabila orang melayu terus memerintah di negara ini maka keamanan dan kesejahteraan akan terus dapat dikekalkan. Apabila kuasa pemerintahan dikuasai oleh orang bukan melayu, orang melayu tidak sesekali akan bertoleransi dalam hal ini dan kekacauan akan berlaku. Dan ini akan menyebabkan rusuhan dan keadaan yang tidak stabil akan wujud di Malaysia. Orang melayu merupakan pemilik asal negara ini dan mereka telah memerintah negara ini sudah ratusan tahun lamanya. Terdapat bukti yang menunjukkan orang melayu telah lama memegang tampuk pemerintahan di Tanah Melayu dan di Kepuluan Borneo sebelum penjajah datang ke Tanah Melayu. Kaum cina dan india telah datang ke Tanah Melayu ini sebagai pedagang dan pekerja buruh, sebahagian daripada mereka telah berkahwin dengan penduduk tempatan dan menetap disini. Tanah Melayu dan Kepulauan Borneo adalah milik orang melayu sementara cina dan india adalah pendatang dan kemudian diterima oleh orang melayu untuk menjadi sebahagian dari penduduk negara ini. Orang melayu memang terkenal dengan kemurahan hati serta ramah mesra dan sifat keterbukaan menerima kaum cina dan india untuk menjadi sebahagian daripada penduduk negara yang dulunya dikenali sebagai Persekutuan Tanah Melayu dan kemudiannya dikenali sebagai Malaysia.
British memberi kemerdekaan kepada Persekutuan Tanah Melayu kerana orang melayu bersedia menerima jutaan kaum cina dan india untuk menjadi warganegara yang mana mereka ini telah dibawa masuk oleh British ke Tanah Melayu untuk membantu mereka dalam urusan mereka dinegara ini. British membawa kaum india ke negara ini untuk membantu mereka bekerja di ladang getah, orang dari sri lanka digunakan untuk membantu mereka dalam urusan pentadbiran dan kaum cina digunkan dalam urusan perniagaan dan perlombongan bijih timah. Apabila orang melayu bersedia dan sanggup menerima kerakyatan kaum cina dan india, ia merupakana satu faktor terbesar kepada British untuk memberi kemerdekaan kepada Persekutuan Tanah Melayu. Kaum cina dan india yang tinggal di Malaysia sebelum merdeka merupakan sebenarnya rakyat British. Sekiranya orang melayu enggan menerima kerakyatan kaum cina dan india maka British terpaksa membawa mereka ke negara mereka di United Kingdom dan ini merupakan satu masalah besar kepada British. Oleh kerana kemurahan hati orang melayu terhadap kaum cina dan india maka kedua-dua kaum ini telah bersetuju untuk tidak mempersoalkan hak istimewa yang diberikan kepada orang melayu melalui perlembagaan. Orang melayu merasakan bahawa mereka berhak untuk mendapat hak istimewa kerana mereka percaya negara ini adalah milik mereka dan mereka mahukan keistimewaan tersebut ditulis dalam perlembagaan Malaysia dan diluluskan oleh Parlimen.
Kebanyakan pemimpin yang merupakan generasi awal dari orang melayu, kaum cina dan india yang telah bersetuju dengan sosial kontrak ini sehingga Persekutuan Tanah Melayu diberi kemerdekaan oleh British telah meninggal dunia. Kebanyakan pemimpin sekarang dari orang melayu, kaum cina dan india tidak menyedari hakikat kewujudan sosial kontrak yang mana ketiga-tiga kaum terdahulu ini telah persetujui sebelum negara ini memperolehi kemerdekaan dari British. Kebanyakan pemimpin dari kaum cina dan india sekarang yang lahir setelah negara ini merdeka mulai mempersoalkan hak keistimewaan orang melayu kerana mereka percaya mereka juga adalah sebahagian daripada rakyat negara ini kerana mereka lahir di Malaysia sepertimana orang melayu dan mereka mahukan hak yang sama sepertimana hak yang diberikan kepada orang melayu. Sebenarnya, selagi mereka adalah dari kaum cina dan india tidak kira selama mana mereka tinggal di Malaysia, mereka tidak boleh mendapat hak istimewa yang diberikan kepada kaum melayu. Kebanyakan kaum cina dan india terutamanya yang lahir di Malaysia selepas merdeka, merasakan adalah tidak adil memberi hak istimewa hanya kepada orang melayu dan tidak kepada mereka. Mereka merasakan hal ini tidak adil kerana mereka tidak sesekali boleh menjadi orang melayu untuk menikmati hak tersebut dan mereka tidak ada pilihan untuk dilahirkan sebagai orang cina atau india.
Kebanyakan kaum cina dan india yang lahir di Malaysia mahukan hak yang sama sepertimana yang diberikan kepada orang melayu dan mereka tidak gembira dengan hakikat sebenar bahawa hanya orang melayu sahaja memiliki hak istimewa ini sementara mereka tidak diberi. Kaum cina dan india tidak senang dengan hak istimewa orang melayu ini dan mereka dari masa ke semasa cuba mempersoalkan hak istimewa orang melayu ini melalui media. Setiap kali kaum cina dan india mempersoalkan hak istimewa orang melayu di media maka orang melayu tidak senang hati dan menjadi marah. Apabila orang melayu menjadi marah, mereka akan menyuruh kaum cina dan india menutup mulut dan menyuruh mereka menerima sosial kontrak yang telah dipersetujui oleh pemimpin awal mereka. Rata-rata kaum cina dan india tidak gembira dengan teguran yang dibuat oleh orang melayu dan apabila mereka mendapat peluang, mereka kembali mempersoal hak istimewa orang melayu.
Saya berpandangan bahawa ketidakpuasan hati dari kaum cina dan india hanya menunggu masa dan keadaan sesuai untuk bertukar menjadi lebih buruk. Kerajaan sedang membuat usaha untuk meredakan isu ini dengan memperkenalkan slogan ‘Satu Malaysia’,tetapi hakikat sebenarnya suasana politik di Malaysia adalah tidak stabil. Jika ia tidak diurus dengan baik oleh pemimpin sekarang, ketidakpuasan hati dari kaum tersebut akan menyebabkan kekacauan kaum mudah tercetus seperti yang berlaku pada 13 Mei 1969. Kaum cina dan india di Malaysia tidak puashati dengan hak istimewa yang diberikan kepada orang melayu dan mereka hanya menunggu masa yang sesuai untuk membantah dan ini akan menyebabkan rusuhan kaum mungkin akan berlaku. Semua kaum cina dan india menuntut keadilan diantara kaum dan mereka mahu hak istimewa yang diberikan kepada sesuatu kaum dihapuskan.

Saya juga berpandangan bahawa parti pembangkang mahu memenangi pilihanraya umum akan datang dan mereka mahu perdana menteri Malaysia dari kaum cina atau india. Dibawah undang-undang sekarang, Yang DiPertuan Agong merupakan orang yang paling berkuasa untuk menentukan siapa yang akan menjadi perdana menteri Malaysia. Yang DiPertuan Agong semestinya mahukan orang melayu dan orang islam untuk dilantik menjadi perdana menteri Malaysia. Untuk itu, selagi kuasa yang diberikan kepada Yang DiPertuan Agong tidak dihapuskan maka kaum cina dan india tidak boleh menjadi perdana menteri Malaysia. Untuk kaum cina dan india menjadi perdana menteri Malaysia, mereka mesti hapuskan undang-undang yang memberi hak istimewa kepada orang melayu dan kuasa yang diberi kepada Raja-Raja Melayu. Parti pembangkang bercita-cita untuk menang pilihanraya umum akan datang dan untuk menang mereka mesti bekerja keras, untuk mencapai hasrat tersebut kaum cina dan india bersatu dan sayangnya orang melayu berpecah belah untuk mempertahankan hak mereka iaitu hak orang islam dan melayu. Jika parti pembangkang memenangi pilihanraya umum nanti dan orang bukan melayu akan membentuk majoriti di Parlimen, dan kemudian dengan majoriti dua pertiga mereka boleh menghapuskan undang-undang yang melindungi hak istimewa orang melayu, islam dan juga yang diberikan kepada Raja-Raja Melayu.
Situasi politik sekarang di Malaysia jelas menunjukkan bahawa orang melayu tidak lagi bersatu. Orang melayu telah berpecah kepada tiga kumpulan parti politik yang majoritinya adalah orang melayu. Orang melayu dari ketiga-tiga kumpulan parti politik ini saling membantah antara satu sama lain. Walaupun orang melayu merupakan etnik terbesar di Malaysia tetapi apabila mereka berpecah kerana perbezaan edologi politik maka mereka menjadi kumpulan minoriti. Apabila menjadi kumpulan minoriti maka orang melayu akan hilang kuasa politik yang mereka sedang nikmati sekarang ini. Orang melayu akan kekal berkuasa jika sekiranya mereka terus bersatu dan kekal sebagai kumpulan etnik terbesar. Apabila orang melayu tidak bersatu dalam politik maka orang melayu akan kehilangan kuasa untuk memerintah negara ini dan pada ketika itu mereka tidak lagi dapat menikmati hak istimewa orang melayu sebagaimana yang mereka nikmati sekarang. Pada ketika itu juga, orang melayu khususnya yang menentang perpaduan orang melayu akan menyesal. Orang melayu akan menjadi seperti orang arab di Palestin dan cina serta india akan jadi seperti Yahudi di Israel. Dibelakang cina dan india akan dibantu dan disokong oleh Amerika dan Singapura. Kerajaan Amerika dan Singapura akan melindungi kaum cina dan india di Malaysia kerana kaum tersebut akan mudah memberi bantuan kepada mereka berbanding orang melayu. Orang melayu akan menjadi pesalah dan pelarian di negara sendiri dan raja melayu akan diturunkan dan tidak lagi berkuasa serta raja melayu akan hilang segala keistimewaan yang dinikmati sekarang. Keadaan yang lebih buruk akan berlaku di Malaysia dimana orang melayu yang merupakan penganut agama islam tidak lagi berpeluang bebas mengamalkan agama islam seperti sekarang sebagaimana yang berlaku di Singapura dimana orang islam hanya dibenarkan melaungkan azan di dalam masjid sahaja dan tidak boleh berkumadang seperti di Malaysia. Pada ketika itu kumpulan melayu yang menentang perpaduan orang melayu mungkin telah meninggal dunia tetapi mereka akan dikenang oleh generasi melayu akan datang sebagai pengkhianat dan musuh orang melayu.
Prof Dr Nasoha Saabin
September 2010
Integrative Holistic Wellness Centre

Posted in POLITIC | Leave a comment

MCA-ITS PROBLEM

The problem in MCA starts when the sex scandal of Datuk Seri Dr Chua Soi Lek made known to the public. His political enemies must have planned the exposure of the sex scandal. Datuk Seri Dr Chua admitted that he has committed the immoral acts and immediately he resigns from all his post including the post as the Minister of Health. By admitting and resigning from all post, Datuk Seri Dr Chua Soi Lek had shown a high level of integrity as a politician. He had made a very wise decision to resign from all posts. With his immediate resignation the whole stories about his sex scandal stops. Datuk Seri Dr Chua Soi Lek had asked forgiveness from his wife and from all Malaysians. He had admitted that the woman in the video was his old time friend. A friend of mine told me that it is a common practice among married Chinese men to have sexual relationship with another woman. As long as they do not marry the woman their wives tend to tolerate the immoral acts of their husband..

To err is human and to ask forgiveness is a noble act. God has created us, as a human being and every human being are not free from making mistakes. God loves to forgive us, when we asked forgiveness from God. Datuk Seri Dr Chua Soi Lek was transgressing the orders of God and he should have asked forgiveness from God. Datuk Seri Dr Chua had not committed any mistakes to his family and to fellow Malaysians but he had committed an act, which is against the orders of God. He was having sexual relationship with another woman who is not his wife, even though the act done with mutual consent. Many other politicians are doing the same immoral acts but their actions not exposed to the public. Many politicians are practicing elicit sex but unfortunately for Datuk Seri Dr Chua Soi Lek, his elicit sexual relationship was made exposed. The acts of exposing the wrongdoing of others are not allowed by any religion but it is permissible in politic. Politic is the religion of those who believes that the ends satisfy the means. In other words, most politicians believe that we can use any means as long as we can achieved our goal and the goal of most politicians is to gain power and glory. In the eyes of God, Datuk Seri Dr Chua political enemies were doing more wrong than he was when they exposed his sexual scandals. The aim of exposing the scandal was to tarnish the good image of Datuk Seri Dr Chua as a leader.

When Datuk Seri Dr Chua Soi Lek resigned from all posts, he has shown a high level of integrity as a politician. Nowadays it is hard to find politicians with such integrity even among Muslims politician. Many politicians even Muslims are not willing to admit their immoral acts that they have committed even though all evidences show they have committed the acts. They will do whatever it takes to show that they are clean and pious. Because of the exposure of the sexual scandal of Datuk Seri Dr Chua Soi Lek, there exist within MCA, two camps. One camps support Datuk Seri Dr Chua Soi Lek and the other camp support the President Tan Sri Ong Tee Kiat. The existence of these two camps within MCA were the major reasons for the crisis within MCA. The leader of these two camps cannot be together as each camp was trying to remove the other. Although Datuk Seri Dr Chua Soi Lek was the Deputy President of MCA but he cannot works with the President Tan Sri Ong Tee Kiat as both belongs to different camps.

MCA had tried to solve the problem by having a special general meeting. However, the outcomes of the meeting cannot solve the problem. Tan Sri Ong Tee Kiat refused to resign as President and Datuk Seri Dr Chua Soi Lek remains the Deputy President. The crisis lasted for some months and it has tarnished the image of MCA and the Chinese communities at large. In recent general election of MCA, delegates must have forgiven Datuk Seri Dr Chua Soi Lek for his immoral act when they selected him as the President of MCA. MCA delegates seem to favor Datuk Seri Dr Chua instead of Dato’ Seri Ong Tee Kiat and Datuk Seri Ong Ka Ting. God seems to favor Dr Chua more than the other two leaders. It is hope that under the leadership of Datuk Seri Dr Chua Soi Lek, MCA remain united as a party. There should not be any groups within MCA. In case MCA continue to have groups, MCA will not be able to represent the Chinese communities in Malaysia in the next general election. Our Prime Minister has also highlighted this point very clearly.
Prof Dr Nasoha Saabin
April 2010
Integrative Holistic Wellness Centre

Posted in POLITIC | Tagged | Leave a comment

LOCAL ELECTION IN HULU SELANGOR

I was born in Kampong Sungai Choh, Rawang Hulu Selangor about 55 years ago. Now at this time, this area has attracted the attention of politicians and the public in the whole country. Hulu Selangor has attracted the attention of the nation because in the coming Sunday there will be a local election. The local election is to choose a new parliamentary representative of the peoples due to the death of Datuk Dr Zainal Abidin of PKR. Barisan National has nominated P Kamalanathan of MIC as their candidates and PKR has nominated Datuk Zaid Ibrahim. Besides the two candidates, representing the two main political parties in Malaysia there are also two candidates contesting in the election as the representative of non-partisan but both of them finally withdraw. The general breakdown of the population consists of 53.94 percent Malays, 18.98 percent Indians and 26.67 percent Chinese, others consist of 0.41percent.The Malays are Muslims, and the rest are mostly non-Muslims.

In the last by election in Negeri Sembilan, Barisan National wins and many believe that it was the beginning of the awakening of Barisan National. Our Prime Minister Datuk Seri Najib gave a smiling face when the result of the election announced. He was certainly very happy with the result, because it somehow indicates to a certain extent the acceptance of the people on his leadership as the new President of Barisan National and the Prime Minister of Malaysia. Prior to this Barisan National had lost almost all-local election conducted since the last general election. It was a great moment of joy for all the leaders of the Barisan National to see their candidates Dato’ Mohd Isa Samad wins the election. Many political analysts also believe that the result of the election indicates the acceptance of the people on the concept of one Malaysia mooted by our Prime Minister. Hulu Selangor by election is another test to the leadership of Prime Minister and the concept of one Malaysia.

Politically, Hulu Selangor has always been in the hand of Barisan National and MIC has always represented it. When I was young, I can remember Barisan National always wins in Hulu Selangor and the candidates were always from MIC. In those days, Malays in Hulu Selangor are very loyal to Umno and Barisan National. They will always support Barisan National. No matter whoever the candidate was, they support Umno and Barisan National. In those days, the support of the Malays in Hulu Selangor toward Umno and Barisan National was undivided. Now the situation has changed dramatically. Malay support towards Umno and Barisan National is no longer, as it was before. Many Malays particularly the young support PKR. In the last general election PKR win the Parliamentary seat ofHulu Selangor, which was traditionally, belong to Barisan National. Many young voters want to have reform and they opted for PKR. They want reform and they had enough with Barisan National. In the last general election, PKR took over Selangor from Barisan National.

One advantage PKR has over Barisan is that PKR has nominated Malay while Barisan National has nominated Indian to be the candidates. Although our Prime Minister has put a great thought on who should be the candidates to represent Barisan National but in the end, he decides MIC to represent Barisan National. Najib has clearly said that the choice he made is base on ‘setiakawan’. He has made the choice because MIC has traditionally contested as the representatives of Barisan National in Hulu Selangor. Our Prime Minister has made the choice in order to maintain harmony between the component parties in Barisan National and not on the needs of the time and place. According to the needs of time and place Barisan National should chose Malay to be the candidate. The situation has now changed dramatically and although it may hurt MIC; the right choice of candidates to represent Barisan National in Hulu Selangor according to the needs of time and place should be a good Muslim Malay.

When Barisan National put up P Kamalanathan as the candidates versus Datuk Zaid Ibrahim of PKR, the Umno members can smell that they are at the disadvantage .Umno members fear that the Malays in Hulu Selangor may vote for Datuk Zaid Ibrahim instead of P Kamalanathan from Barisan National. In order to counter the disadvantage, Umno members start the tactic of exposing the bad qualities of Datuk Zaid Ibrahim. Umno members has label Datuk Zaid Ibrahim as a person addicted to alcohol. Datuk Zaid Ibrahim has admitted that he is not an angel and he said that he has asked forgiveness from Allah. Even though Datuk Zaid Ibrahim maybe an alcoholic but he is still a Muslim and he is thousand times better than a non-Muslims are. Allah has ordered us to respect a Muslim and not to expose their wrong doings because they have recited the Kalimah. When Umno members continue to attack the personalities of Datuk Zaid Ibrahim, Allah is not please with them and Barisan National may lose this by election. None can give honor and disgrace but Allah. Allah is the One that decide who will wins in this election and not the people. The decision of Allah is base on the amals of the people and not on their wealth and power. It is not the people who give power but Allah. Allah is the One that gives government and Allah is the One that take away government. Allah decides to give government to those with better amal.

Prof Dr Nasoha Saabin
April 2010
Integrative Holistic Wellness Centre

Posted in POLITIC | Tagged | Leave a comment

LIM KIT SIANG, PERDANA MENTERI MALAYSIA?

Mengikut perlembagaan Malaysia, siapa sahaja tidak kira bangsa atau agama boleh menjadi perdana menteri Malaysia. Sekiranya parti pembangkang memenangi pilihanraya yang akan datang dan Lim Kit Siang menjadi ketua pembangkang, dalam apa jua keadaan pun Lim kit Siang layak untuk menjadi perdana menteri Malaysia. Apabila Parti Kongres India memenangi pilihanraya di India, Sonia Ghandi sepatutnya menjadi perdana menteri India kerana dia merupakan ketua Parti Kongres India pada masa itu dan kini. Walaubagaimanapun dia tidak menjadi perdana menteri India kerana mengikut kelahiran dia adalah bukan keturunan India tetapi kelahiran Itali. Golongan Hindu membantah cadangan tersebut iaitu melantik orang yang berketurunan bukan India menjadi perdana menteri India. Sonia ialah isteri kepada Rajiv Ghandi yang merupakan bekas perdana menteri India dan Sonia telah mendapat status warganegara India. Setelah kematian suaminya Sonia menceburkan diri dalam politik dan menjadi ketua kepada Parti Kongres India. Parti beliau memenangi pilihanraya di India. Dibawah perlembagaan India dia berhak menjadi perdana menteri India. Walaubagaimanapun ramai rakyat India tidak menerima dia sebagai perdana menteri. Pada ketika itu banyak bantahan di seluruh negara yang menafikan kelayakan Sonia menjadi perdana menteri India. Ada 2 orang wanita yang merupakan ahli parlimen India bernekad untuk membunuh diri sekiranya Sonia menjadi perdana menteri India. Pada pandangan saya Sonia telah membuat keputusan yang tepat untuk tidak menjadi perdana menteri India dan sebaliknya dia melantik Marmohan Singh menjadi perdana menteri India. Keputusan beliau telah membuatkan keadaan politik di India aman dan tenang dan juga menaikkan nama beliau sebagai pemimpin dan wanita yang hebat di negara beliau. Sangat sedikit di dunia ini seperti beliau yang sanggup menyerah kuasa dan memilih supaya negara menjadi aman dan stabil daripada memilih untuk memegang kuasa pemerintahan, mengejar nama tetapi keadaan yang kacau bilau.
Walaupun negara India mengamalkan demokrasi tetapi dalam memilih siapa yang akan menjadi perdana menteri, mereka tidak mengamalkan demokrasi mutlak dalam menentukannya. Untuk menjadi perdana menteri dalam negara yang mengamalkan sistem demokrasi, seseorang perlu menjadi popular dan parti yang diketuainya perlu memengangi pilihanraya. Negara India merupakan sebuah negara yang demokrasi tetapi dalam masa yang sama masih mengekalkan sistem kasta dan perkauman. Walaupun sistem kasta dan perkauman perlahan-lahan ditinggalkan namun ia masih diamalkan oleh kebanyakan rakyat India dan termasuklah orang islam di negara tersebut, terutamanya yang tinggal di bahagian utara India. Walaupun mereka telah lama memeluk agama islam namun amalan kasta dan perkauman masih segar dalam jiwa mereka. Apabila golongan kaya mengadakan majlis perkahwinan, hanya yang kaya dijemput menghadirinya. Perkahwinan merupakan suatu yang ditentukan dengan siapa boleh berkahwin dan perkahwinan diluar daripada kasta mereka adalah tidak dibenarkan sama sekali. Dalam sistem demokrasi, semua lelaki adalah sama dari segi hak dan peluang dalam satu-satu perkara. Dalam sistem ini juga, apabila seseorang mempunyai kelayakan, tidak kira apa bangsa yang dimilikinya, dia mempunyai hak untuk menjadi ketua negara. Sekiranya Lim Kit Siang layak, dia bukan sahaja layak untuk menjadi timbalan perdana menteri bahkan dia layak untuk menjadi perdana menteri Malaysia. Ketua parti pembangkang sepatutnya adalah Lim Kit Siang dan bukannya Datuk Seri Anwar Ibrahim kerana DAP memiliki kerusi paling banyak di parlimen dalam pilihanraya umum yang lalu tetapi Lim Kit Siang sememangnya bijak membuat percaturan politik dengan menggunakan Datuk Seri Anwar Ibrahim. Lim Kit Siang menolak untuk dilantik menjadi ketua pembangkang dan memberikan jawatan itu kepada Anwar kerana Lim Kit Siang tahu bahawa Anwar lebih diterima oleh penyokong PAS sebagai ketua pembangkang jika dibandingkan dengan beliau. Lim Kit Siang memahami bahawa Anwar seorang melayu dan dia boleh bercakap mengenai islam dengan bagus sekali. Dengan keupayaan bercakap dan berhujah, Anwar cukup bijak untuk mempengaruhi kebanyakan orang yang dia adalah pemimpin islam yang hebat.
Mengikut sistem demokrasi yang sebenarnya, Lim Kit Siang sepatutnya menjadi ketua pembangkang dan bukannya Anwar. Jika sekiranya pembangkang memenangi pilihanraya umum yang akan datang, Lim Kit Siang sepatutnya menjadi perdana menteri Malaysia dan bukannya Datuk Seri Anwar Ibrahim. Datuk Seri Anwar Ibrahim memberitahu wartawan bahawa semua orang layak tidak kira apa bangsa dan agama dalam sistem demokrasi untuk menjadi timbalan perdana menteri Malaysia. Datuk Seri Anwar Ibrahim percaya di Malaysia dialah yang paling layak berbanding Lim Kit Siang untuk menjadi perdana menteri kerana dia merupakan seorang melayu dan beragama islam. Sebenarnya dengan kepercayan ini, Anwar tidak mengamalkan demokrasi mutlak tetapi sebaliknya mengamalkan demokrasi tidak mutlak seperti di negara India. Perkara yang sama berlaku kepada Sonia Ghandi di India. Walaupun dibawah pemerintahan sistem demokrasi di India dia layak menjadi Perdana Menteri India, tetapi ramai rakyat di negara tersebut tidak boleh terima hakikat tersebut. Sonia tahu dia tidak boleh menjadi perdana menteri India kerana dia tidak diterima oleh kebanyakan rakyat negara tersebut kerana dia bukan kelahiran India sebaliknya sebagai seorang kelahiran Itali. Ini membuktikan bahawa India tidak mengamalkan demokrasi mutlak.
Malaysia juga sebuah negara yang tidak mengamalkan demokrasi mutlak. Adalah tidak menjadi kesalahan untuk tidak mengamalkan demokrasi mutlak. Sistem demokrasi ialah satu sistem yang dicipta oleh manusia. Demokrasi bukan satu sistem yang bersifat universal dan ia terbukti tidak berjalan dengan baik di kebanyakan negara dan ia tidak sesuai untuk semua orang yang memiliki kefahaman yang berbeza-beza. Allah tidak mengutuskan Nabi Muhammad saw untuk menggunakan sistem demokrasi bagi menjalankan pemerintahan setelah Allah memberikan baginda kuasa pemerintahan. Walaupun dalam sistem demokrasi, konsep kesamaan yang menentukan semua orang mempunyai hak yang sama wujud dalam ajaran islam namun dalam sistem demokrasi kaedah dalam menentukan atau memilih pemimpin adalah tidak menurut ajaran islam. Walaupun ia tidak ditulis secara jelas dalam perlembagaan Malaysia, bahawa seseorang yang dilantik menjadi perdana menteri Malaysia mestilah seorang melayu dan beragama islam namun saya berpandangan bahawa orang melayu tidak akan menerima orang bukan melayu dan orang bukan islam untuk dipilih menjadi perdana menteri Malaysia dan begitu juga dengan jawatan timbalan perdana menteri. Sekiranya Lim Kit Siang menjadi walaupun sebagai timbalan perdana menteri, saya berpandangan bahawa negara ini akan bertukar menjadi huru hara. Baru-baru ini, Tuan Guru Datuk Nik Aziz pada mulanya memberi komen terhadap kenyataan Anwar tentang Lim Kit Siang boleh menjadi timbalan perdana menteri Malaysia bahawa dia bersetuju dengan kenyataan Anwar selagi ia tidak bercanggah dengan perlembagaan Malaysia. Tetapi tidak lama selepas itu, Tuan Guru Nik Aziz membuat kenyataan bahawa Lim Kit Siang boleh menjadi timbalan perdana menteri Malaysia jika Lim Kit Siang memeluk agama islam dan menjadi orang islam yang baik. Dalam kata lain, Tuan Guru mengajar Lim Kit Siang untuk memeluk agama islam dengan niat untuk menjadi timbalan perdana menteri Malaysia dan bukan memeluk islam ikhlas kerana Allah. Tuan Guru mengajar Lim Kit Siang memeluk islam dengan niat yang tidak ikhlas kerana Allah. Di Malaysia, kebanyakan orang Cina dan India yang memeluk islam kerana hanya semata-mata ingin berkahwin dengan wanita islam dan bukan niat semata-mata kerana menyukakan Allah.
Walaupun seorang ulama seperti Tuan Guru Datuk Nik Aziz, tetapi bila terlibat dalam politik dia melakukan banyak kesilapan. Walaubagaimanapun, semua kesalahan yang dibuat oleh Tuan Guru Datuk Nik Aziz akan dimaafkan dan tidak diambil peduli oleh ahli-ahli PAS kerana Tuan Guru adalah merupakan Mursyidul Am PAS. Setiap kali Tuan Guru membuat kenyataan yang salah atau tidak senada dengan Datuk Seri Anwar Ibrahim, Anwar segera menyelamatkan keadaan dengan mengatakan kenyataan yang diberi oleh Tuan Guru adalah pandangan peribadinya. Sebenarnya, tidak ada pandangan yang diberi oleh seorang ketua bersifat peribadi. Suatu pandangan dikatakan pandangan peribadi jika dibuat oleh seseorang yang tidak memegang apa-apa jawatan atau tanggungjawab sebagai ketua dalam satu pertubuhan. Ahli PAS tidak boleh membantah apa saja kenyataan yang dibuat oleh Tuan Guru Nik Aziz. Apa sahaja yang dia fikir dan percaya akan mempengaruhi hala tuju PAS.
Parti pembangkang tidak mempunyai persetujuan bersama dalam menentukan siapa yang sepatutnya menjadi perdana menteri dan timbalan perdana menteri Malaysia setakat ini jika mereka memenangi pilihanraya umum akan datang. Apabila mereka memenangi pilihanraya umum nanti mereka akan sibuk dengan perselisihan pendapat dalam menentukan siapa yang sepatutnya menjadi timbalan perdana menteri dan perdana menteri kerana disebabkan kelebihan yang akan diperolehi melalui jawatan tersebut, yang sepatutnya mereka sibuk dalam mentadbir-urus hal ehwal negara. Rakyat Malaysia mempunyai pilihan untuk mengamalkan demokrasi mutlak dan berkemungkinan negara menjadi huru-hara atau untuk mengamalkan demokrasi yang tidak mutlak tetapi negara dapat mengekalkan keamanan dan kemajuan negara. Apa yang penting bukanlah sistem apa yang digunakan tetapi yang penting ialah negara dapat mengekalkan keamanan dan negara bergerak menuju menjadi sebuah negara maju. Kita sepatutnya meletakkan kepentingan negara dan kebajikan rakyat diatas daripada meletakkan kepentingan sistem apa yang hendak digunakan. Apabila keadaan negara masih huru hara dan matlamat menjadikan negara maju tidak tercapai walaupun demokrasi tidak mutlak diamalkan, sepatutnya Malaysia perlu mengorak langkah kepada sistem pemerintahan yang lain yang membawa keuntungan kepada negara. Sekiranya, sistem pemerintahan tersebut digunakan dan ia mampu membawa kepada keamanan dan kemajuan negara, Malaysia seharusnya meneruskan sistem tersebut. Dalam keadaan negara kita yang mempunyai pelagai kaum, pelbagai agama dan pelbagai bahasa, pada pandangan saya sistem pemerintahan yang terbaik ialah sistem pemerintahan yang ditelah diberi oleh Allah kepada Nabi Muhammad saw. Dalam pemerintahan islam, pemimpin mestilah yang dipilih ialah yang terbaik dari kalangan orang islam dalam sesebuah negara dan pemilihan mestilah dibuat oleh orang yang bertanggungjawab dan orang yang baik dalam negara tersebut. Hanya orang baik siapa sahaja mengenali siapa orang yang terbaik dikalangan mereka. Memilih pemimpin melalui pilihanraya yang mana orang bodoh dan orang buruk juga boleh memberi undi, adalah tidak terdapat ajaran islam dan sememangnyalah banyak kelemahan dalam pemilihan tersebut.
Islam sentiasa menjadi jalan keluar dalam segala masalah yang datang dalam dunia ini tetapi sayangnya tidak ramai orang yang benar-benar faham ajaran islam sebenar dan tidak ramai yang benar-benar mengamalkan islam yang sebenar. Ramai orang islam pandai bercakap tentang islam tetapi sayangnya mereka tidak mengamalkan islam sebagaimana yang telah diamalkan oleh Nabi Muhammad saw semasa hayat baginda. Negara Malaysia mempunyai masalah sepertimana negara-nagara lain mempunyai masalah. Allah hanya akan selesaikan masalah kita apabila kita semua benar-benar mentaati perintah Allah yang ditelah ditunjukkan oleh Nabi Muhammad saw.
Prof Dr Nasoha Saabin
December 2010
Integrative Holistic Wellness Centre

Posted in POLITIC | Leave a comment

LIM KIT SIANG, MALAYSIAN PRIME MINISTER?

According to the constitution, anybody regardless of race and religion can become the Prime Minister of Malaysia. Should the Opposition parties win in the next general election and Lim Kit Siang is the Opposition leader at that time; he is eligible even to become the Prime Minister of Malaysia.
When Sonia Gandhi won in large margin the Rae Bareilly constituency in Uttar Pradesh in the 2004 Indian general election, she was elected to be the leader of a 15-party coalition government which was subsequently named the United Progressive Alliance (UPA) and thus was expected to become the Prime Minister of India. However, she could not become the Prime Minister of India because she is not an Indian by birth. Many of the Indians are against the idea that a non-Indian become the Prime Minister of India. Sonia was born an Italian in Lusiana, Italy and was the wife of the late Rajiv Ghandi, the former Prime Minister of India and has become the citizen of India. After the death of her husband, Sonia entered politics and became the leader of the Congress party. She is the leader of the coalition party that has won the Indian election. Under the Indian Constitution, she has the right to become the Prime Minister of India. However many Indians were not ready to accept her as the Prime Minister of India. There were many protests all over the country against her becoming the Prime Minister of India.There were two female members of the parliament who had threaten to commit suicide if Sonia were made the Prime Minister of India. In my opinion, Sonia has made the correct decision not to become the Prime Minister and instead she has chosen Dr. Manmohan Singh to become the Prime Minister of India. Her decision has returned calm and peace to the country and raised her status to be a great woman and a great leader of India. There are few in the world who were willing to step down for the sake of peace and stability for the country like her instead of clinging on to the position and power.
Even though India practices democracy, but there is no democracy in choosing who should become the Prime Minister of India. Generally, in order to become the leader in a democratic country, you have to be popular and the party that you lead must win the general election. India is a democratic country, but still strongly practices caste system and racism. Although caste and racism is slowly dying in other parts of the World but it is still being practiced by the majority of the people in India. Even the Muslims in India, particularly those in the north still practices caste system. They have long embraced Islam but caste and racism are still in their minds. Normally when rich Muslims hold marriage function in India, only the rich will be invited. Marriage is still an arranged affair in India and no one is allowed to marry outside his or her race and caste. In a democratic system, all men are equal and all men have equal right and opportunities. In a democratic system, when a person is qualified, no matter what race he or she belongs to, he or she can become the state leader. In case Lim Kit Siang is qualified, he can become not only the Deputy Prime Minister but even the Prime Minister of Malaysia. The leader of the opposition party should have been Lim Kit Siang and not Dato’ Seri Anwar Ibrahim since DAP had won the most seats in the Parliament during the last general election but Lim Kit Siang certainly know how to play the political game with Dato’ Seri Anwar. Lim Kit Siang has declined to take the position as the leader of the Opposition and gave the position to Anwar as Lim Kit Siang knows; Anwar is more acceptable to PAS as the leader of the Opposition than him. Lim Kit Siang understands that Anwar is a Malay and he can talk very good about Islam. With oratorical talent, Anwar can convince everybody that he is a great Islamic leader.
In reality, according to a democratic system Lim Kit Siang should have become the leader of the Opposition and not Anwar. In case in the next general election, the Opposition win, Lim Kit Siang shall become the Prime Minister of Malaysia and not Dato’ Seri Anwar Ibrahim. Dato’Seri Anwar told the press that irrespective of race and religion anyone who is qualified under the democratic system can become the Deputy Prime Minister of Malaysia. Dato Seri Anwar believes in Malaysia he is more suitable than Lim Kit Siang to become the Prime Minister since is a Malay Muslim. Anwar is not practicing absolute democracy but a non-absolute democracy as in India. The case seems similar to Sonia Gandhi in India. Although under the Indian democratic system, she was qualified to become the Prime Minister of India, many of the Indians could not accept her as their Prime Minister. Sonia knows that she cannot become the Prime Minister of India because she is not acceptable to many of the Indians. She is not acceptable to many of the Indians because she is not an Indian. It is acceptable to say that India does not practice absolute democracy.
Malaysia too is not practicing absolute democracy. There is nothing wrong not to practice absolute democracy. Democracy is a man-made system. Democracy is not an ideal system; it does not work in all countries, and for all types of people. Allah does not reveal to Prophet Muhammad saw the democratic system of governance. Although in a democratic system, the equality concept that regards men are all equal before law is Islamic but the method of selecting leaders is not Islamic. Although it was not written in the Malaysian Constitution, the convention is that the person who is to become the Prime Minister of Malaysia must be Malay and a Muslim. In my opinion, the Malays will not accept a non-Malay and a non-Muslim to become the Prime Minister of Malaysia or even the Deputy Prime Minister of Malaysia. In case Lim Kit Siang becomes even the Deputy Prime Minister, in my opinion, Malaysia will turn to turmoil. Tuan Guru Dato’ Nik Aziz initially commented that Lim Kit Siang can become the Deputy Prime Minister of Malaysia as long as it does not contradict the Constitution of Malaysia. Later on, Tuan Guru Dato’ Nik Aziz said that Lim Kit Siang can become the Deputy Prime Minister of Malaysia if Lim Kit Siang embraces Islam and become a good Muslim. In other words, Tuan Guru is teaching Lim Kit Siang to become a Muslim with the intention to become Deputy Prime Minister and not to please Allah. Tuan Guru is teaching Lim Kit Siang to become Muslim without sincerity. In Malaysia many Chinese and Indians become Muslim because they want to marry a Muslim lady and not because they want to please Allah.
Even a religious scholar, like Tuan Guru Dato’ Nik Abdul Aziz, when he enters politics, may make mistakes. However all the mistakes made by Tuan Guru Dato’ Nik Abdul Aziz will be forgiven and overlooked by Pas members because Tuan Guru is a highly regarded spiritual leader of PAS. Whenever Tuan Guru made a wrong statement, Dato Seri Anwar Ibrahim will quickly come to his rescue by saying that the opinion given by Tuan Guru is personal. No opinion given by a leader is personal. An opinion is only personal when given by a person who has no responsibility or position as a leader in an organization. Tuan Guru Dato’ Nik Abdul Aziz is the Mursidul Am of PAS and whatever he says would be regarded as the opinion of the whole organization of PAS. PAS members cannot argue with statements given by Tuan Guru Nik Abdul Aziz. Whatever he think and believe will influence the direction of PAS.
Even before they win the general election, the members of the Opposition could not even have the consensus of who to become the Prime Minister and the Deputy Prime Minister of Malaysia. When they win the election and see the privileges and benefits of becoming the Prime Minister, the Deputy Prime Minister and the Ministers, in my opinion all of them will be busy quarreling with each other to get the posts rather than busy governing the country. Malaysians have the choice to practice absolute democracy and may have chaos in the country or to practice non-absolute democracy and may have peace and progress in the country. What is important is not the system but that the country is always at peace and is progressing to become an advanced nation. We must put the nation and the people’s interest above the system. When the situation arises whereby even practicing the non-absolute democracy will not bring peace and progress to the nation, Malaysia has to move to another system of governance. In case by adopting certain system of governance, it will bring peace and progress to Malaysia, Malaysia must adopt that system. In multi-racial, multi-religion, and multi-lingual society, in my opinion, the best system will be the system revealed by Allah to Prophet Muhammad saw. In Islamic system of governance, the leader of the Muslims shall be the best person among the Muslims in the country and chosen by responsible and good people of the country. Only good people know who is the best person among them. Selecting a leader through general elections, where fools, stupid and bad people also vote, is not an Islamic system and is certainly susceptible to weaknesses.
Islam is always the answer to all problems in this world but unfortunately not many people understand Islam since many do not practice the true teachings of Islam. Many are only teaching and talking about Islam but do not practice whatever Prophet Muhammad saw had practiced during his lifetime. Malaysia is having problems like other countries. Allah will only solve our problems when we obey all the orders of Allah the way shown by Prophet Muhammad saw.
Prof Dr Nasoha Saabin
December 2010
Integrative Holistic Wellness Centre

Posted in POLITIC | Tagged | Leave a comment

LEMBAYUNG KEAMANAN

Jemaah wujud apabila ada ketua. Tanpa ketua tidak ada jemaah dan tanpa jemaah tidak ada bantuan Allah. Bantuan Allah bersama jemaah dan Allah membantu jemaah melalui perantaraan ketua jemaah. Apabila ada tiga orang maka satu orang perlu menjadi ketua jemaah. Apabila ada ketua barulah jemaah terbentuk dan bersama jemaah ada bantuan dan keberkatan dari Allah. Selagi kita berada dalam jemaah maka selagi itulah kita mendapat keberkatan dan bantuan Allah. Adalah lebih baik mempunyai ketua yang zalim daripada langsung tidak mempunyai ketua. Solat apabila dikerjakan secara berjemaah lebih disukai Allah dari solat yang dikerjakan secara sendirian. Untuk mengerjakan solat berjemaah seorang perlu menjadi imam. Tanpa imam solat tidak dapat dikerjakan dengan berjemaah. Solat dengan berjemaah seramai lapan orang adalah lebih baik dari solat bersendirian seramai seratus orang. Allah gembira apabila kita mengerjakan solat secara berjemaah dan pahala mengerjakan solat berjemaah adalah dua puluh tujuh kali lebih dari mengerjakan solat bersendirian. Apabila umat islam berhimpun kerana Allah dan mengerjakan solat dengan berjemaah Allah sangat gembira. Allah membantu umat ini apabila mereka mengerjakan sesuatu amalan yang diperintah Allah secara berjemaah. Umat islam dikatakan melakukan sesuatu dengan berjemaah apabila umat islam melakukannya dengan dipimpin oleh seorang ketua. Umat islam di seluruh dunia hari ini tidak mempunyai seorang ketua dan tidak berada dalam keadaan satu jemaah. Umat islam adalah dalam keadaan berpecah belah dan tidak mendapat bantuan Allah.
Umat islam diseluruh dunia perlu dipimpin oleh seorang ketua dan apabila ini berlaku barulah umat islam diseluruh dunia dikatakan bergerak sebagai satu jemaah. Pada ketika itu umat islam pasti senantiasa dibantu oleh Allah swt. Umat islam diseluruh dunia hanya dapat disatukan apabila seluruh umat islam diseluruh dunia mempunyai maksud hidup yang sama seperti maksud hidup Muhammad saw. Umat islam tidak akan mempunyai maksud hidup yang sama seperti nabi selagi mereka tidak menjadikan kerja nabi sebagai kerja mereka yang utama. Apabila seluruh umat islam bangun membuat kerja Nabi saw, iaitu mengajak manusia yang belum mengucapkan kalimah kepada mengucapkan kalimah maka iman umat islam akan menjadi betul. Apabila iman umat islam telah menjadi betul maka barulah umat islam menjadi umat yang bersatu hati dan berkasih sayang. Seluruh umat islam akan menjadi seumpama satu badan yang mana jika mana-mana bahagian dari badan itu sakit maka bahagian badan yang lain akan turut merasa sakit. Umat islam di seluruh dunia pada hari ini tidak dapat disatukan seumpama satu badan kerana mereka memiliki iman yang lemah disebabkan mereka telah meninggalkan kerja nabi.
Allah berfirman “Kamu adalah sebaik umat yang dihantar untuk mengajak seluruh manusia kepada kebaikan dan mencegah dari kemungkaran dan kamu beriman kepada Allah”
Seluruh umat islam seluruh dunia sedang berada dalam keadaan berpecah belah dan negara umat islam telah dibahagikan menjadi berbagai negara dan salah satu negara umat islam ialah Malaysia. Malaysia mengamalkan sistem demokrasi berpelembagaan dan Seri Paduka Baginda Yang Di Pertuan Agung (SPBYDPA) adalah ketua negara. SPBYDPA adalah diibaratkan sebagai Waliyul Amri atau Ketua Negara dan beliau melantik Perdana Menteri untuk mentadbir negara. Sebagai ketua negara SPBYDPA adalah lambang keamanan negara. Apabila berlaku perselisihan diantara rakyat yang berbagai kaum maka taat kepada SPBYDPA adalah jalan untuk mengujudkan keamanan. Keamanan dalam negara tidak dapat diwujudkan jika tidak ada ketaatan kepada SPBYDPA. Mentaati keputusan yang telah diambil oleh SPBYDPA adalah amalan agama kerana SPBYDPA adalah amir untuk seluruh rakyat dinegara ini. Seluruh rakyat Malaysia samaada yang beragama islam atau tidak perlu mentaati keputusan yang telah diambil oleh SPBYDPA kerana keputusan itu diambil setelah SPBYDPA bermesyuarat dengan semua raja dan pembesar negara. Mentaati amir dalam islam adalah wajib dan tidak mentaati amir adalah berdosa.
Allah berfirman “Taatlah Allah dan Rasul dan mereka yang telah dijadikan amir dikalangan kamu”
Mentaati Allah dan Rasul dan mentaati amir yang telah dilantik dikalangan kita adalah perintah Allah. Kita taat kepada amir selagi amir tidak menyuruh kita melanggar perintah Allah. Taat kepada amir adalah agama dan melanggar perintah amir adalah berdosa. Walaupun amir itu adalah seorang yang lebih muda daripada kita atau dari keturunan yang lebih rendah namun kita diperintah oleh Allah untuk mentaatinya. Sebelum Nabi saw wafat, beliau telah membentuk satu jemaah untuk menghadapai serangan tentera Rom dan amir untuk jemaah itu ialah Hazrat Usamah bin Zaid, cucu angkat baginda dan anak kepada anak angkat baginda yang asalnya hanyalah seorang hamba abdi bernama Zaid. Walaupun umur Hazrat Usama hanyalah dalam lingkungan dua puluhan namun Nabi Muhammad saw telah mengangkat dia untuk menjadi amir dan diantara makmumnya terdapat sahabat-sahabat yang besar seperti Hazrat Umar khatab ra. Mentaati amir bermakna mentaati Allah dan rasulnya dan melanggar perintah amir adalah seumpama melanggar perintah Allah dan rasulnya. Taat kepada amir adalah sebahagian dari amalan agama yang penting. Apabila kita mentaati amir maka kita bersatu dalam satu gerakan melawan musuh dan apabila kita tidak mentaati amir maka gerakan kita sebagai satu jemaah melawan musuh telah menjadi lemah dan pasti kita akan dapat dikalahkan oleh musuh. Apabila sebahagian dari tentera yang mengikuti Hazrat Ali berpecah pendapat untuk samaada menyerang atau tidak Hazrat Muawiyah, maka Hazrat Ali berkata bahawa kemenangan adalah dipihak Muawiyah. Walaupun Hazrat Ali adalah seorang yang taqwa dan berilmu dan kedudukannya disisi Allah jauh lebih tinggi dari Hazrat Muawiyah namun apabila perpecahan berlaku dikalangan mereka yang mengikuti Hazrat Ali maka kemenangan dalam peperangan itu berpihak kepada Hazrat Muawiyah.
Ketua adalah tunggak kepada perpaduan dan keamanan. Taat kepada ketua adalah perintah Allah yang paling penting untuk diamalkan jika kita inginkan negara yang aman dan sejahtera. Apabila kita taat kepada raja maka kita taat kepada Allah dan rasul. SPBYDPA adalah ketua negara dan negara akan aman hanya apabila SPBYDPA ditaati dan negara akan maju apabila Perdana Menteri ditaati. Walaupun kita mempunyai pandangan yang berbeza namun apabila SPBYDPA telah membuat keputusan setelah bermesyuarat dengan raja-raja dan pembesar negara maka wajib kita mentaatinya. Mempunyai perbezaan pendapat adalah rahmat tetapi perbezaan hati adalah azab. Apabila keputusan telah diambil oleh SPBYDPA maka kita hendaklah melupakan semua pandangan yang kita ada dan menganggap keputusan yang dibuat oleh SPBYDPA adalah juga keputusan kita. Jika seluruh rakyat Malaysia berkelakuan seperti ini samaada yang beragama islam atau tidak maka negara akan senantiasa aman dan sejahtera. Apabila negara aman dan sejahtera maka pembangunan negara dapat berjalan dengan lancar. SPBYDPA memainkan peranan yang sangat penting sebagai ketua negara dan mentaati keputusan SPBYDPA adalah jalan yang selamat untuk menjamin kesejahteraan negara selamanya.
Taat adalah pintu agama. Mereka yang taat akan dapat mengamalkan agama. Taat adalah berkait dengan iman. Mereka yang beriman adalah mereka yang taat. Mereka yang tidak beriman adalah mereka yang tidak taat. Iman berkait dengan kerja Nabi saw. Apabila umat islam bangun membuat kerja Nabi saw iman mereka akan menjadi betul dan mereka akan menjadi rakyat yang taat kepada Allah, Rasul dan kepada SPBYDPA. Memiliki rakyat yang beriman sepatutnya menjadi agenda utama negara, kerana dengan memiliki rakyat yang beriman, kita akan memiliki rakyat yang taat. Apabila kita memiliki rakyat yang taat maka kita akan mendapat negara yang aman dan sejahtera. Kita boleh bercakap tentang taat dan menyuruh orang lain supaya taat tetapi taat datangnya dari iman. Selagi umat islam tidak diajak kepada kerja Nabi saw dan yang bukan islam diajak untuk mengucapkan kalimah laaillahaillallah maka selagi itu kita tidak akan mendapat rakyat yang taat kepada ketua negara. Rakyat yang tidak mempunyai iman tidak akan taat kepada Allah, Rasul dan SPBYDPA. Apabila kita tidak mempunyai rakyat yang taat kepada Allah, Rasul dan SPBYDPA maka kita tidak akan mendapat negara yang aman dan sejahtera. Negara akan senantiasa dilanda dengan pemberontakan dan rusuhan. Mereka akan menuntut agar keinginan mereka dipenuhkan walaupun ianya membahayakan negara. Rakyat yang miskin dan tidak berpelajaran akan digunakan untuk membuat rusuhan untuk menuntut agar keinginan mereka untuk menjadi kaya juga dipenuhkan. Mereka akan melaungkan slogan keadilan dan kebebasan. Mereka mahu agar kekayaan negara dibahagi sama rata dan semua orang mempunyai peluang yang sama untuk menjadi kaya dan berkuasa.
Atas slogan sama rata dan keadilan mereka menuntut agar sistem demokrasi dijalankan. Mereka melaungkan slogan dari rakyat untuk rakyat dan ketua hendaklah dipilih oleh rakyat. Setiap rakyat mempunyai kuasa yang sama untuk memilih ketua negara. Dengan sistem pilihan raya seorang rakyat yang tidak berpelajaran dan tidak beragama mempunyai kuasa yang sama dengan seorang rakyat yang berpelajaran dan beragama untuk memilih ketua. Setiap rakyat mempunyai hanya satu undi untuk memilih ketua mereka. Jika usaha Nabi saw tidak dibuat maka semua rakyat umumnya mempunyai iman yang lemah. Rakyat yang mempunyai iman yang lemah sudah tentu akan memilih mereka yang juga mempunyai iman yang lemah sebagai ketua. Dalam islam ketua hendaklah dipilih oleh golongan yang bertaqwa, berilmu agar mereka yang diangkat menjadi ketua adalah juga mereka yang bertaqwa dan berilmu.
Apabila golongan yang bertaqwa dan berilmu tidak wujud maka pemerintahan sistem beraja adalah lebih baik dari sistem demokrasi. Raja bermesyuarat dengan mereka yang berilmu untuk memilih mereka yang paling baik untuk menjadi Perdana Menteri. Perdana Menteri akan mentadbir negara dengan bermesyuarat dengan Raja. Setelah Nabi saw tinggalkan dunia ini maka umat islam dengan bermesyuarat dikalangan mereka yang bertaqwa dan berilmu telah memilih Hazrat Abu Bakar, Hazrat Umar, Hazrat Usman dan Hazrat Ali menjadi khilafah silih berganti. Apabila golongan yang bertaqwa dan berilmu sudah tiada umat islam telah memilih sistem beraja sebagai cara untuk memerintah negara. Menggunakan sistem demokrasi menguntungkan golongan yang tiada beragama. Mereka yang tiada beragama akan memilih ketua mereka dari mereka yang tiada beragama dan ini bercanggah dengan kehendak Allah swt. Apabila mereka yang tiada beragama menjadi ketua maka negara akan menjadi huru-hara dan agama tidak akan hidup buat selamanya. Malaysia adalah negara yang mempunyai raja dan mengamalkan sistem demokrasi. Jika sistem beraja dihapuskan maka Malaysia akan menuju kepada sistem demokrasi sepenuhnya yang tidak akan menguntungkan umat islam. Dengan sistem demokrasi kumpulan yang ramai akan menguasai kumpulan yang sedikit. Dalam islam kumpulan yang mentaati perintah Allah walaupun sedikit patut dijadikan ketua bagi kumpulan yang ramai yang tidak mentaati Allah agar kumpulan yang tidak mentaati Allah dapat diajak kepada mentaati Allah swt. Harta dan kuasa dalam islam hendaklah digunakan untuk menegakkan agama Allah swt. Kuasa hendaklah diberi kepada mereka yang akan menggunakan kuasa itu untuk menegakkan agama Allah. Apabila masyarakat madina memberi kuasa kepada Nabi Muhammad saw maka Nabi saw telah menggunakan kuasa itu untuk menghidupkan agama di Madinah dan di seluruh dunia.
SPBYDPA adalah lambang keutuhan, keamanan dan kesejahteraan rakyat Malaysia. Sistem kerajaan beraja hendaklah diperkukuhkan kerana ianya lebih menguntungkan umat islam dari sistem kerajaan berdemokrasi. Umat islam hendaklah senantiasa berusaha untuk meningkatkan iman dengan membuat kerja Nabi saw. Apabila umat islam bangun membuat kerja Nabi saw maka iman umat islam akan menjadi kuat dan akan wujud satu hati dan kasih sayang dikalangan umat islam di seluruh dunia. Dari kalangan umat islam yang bertaqwa, berilmu dan berwibawa seorang dari mereka hendaklah dipilih untuk menjadi ketua untuk seluruh umat islam di seluruh dunia. Apabila umat islam seluruh dunia mempunyai seorang ketua maka umat islam pada ketika itu akan bergerak sebagai satu jemaah dan satu badan untuk mengajak seluruh umat manusia kepada kebaikan dan mencegah manusia dari kemungkaran.
Prof Dr Nasoha Saabin
September 2010
Integrative Holistic Wellness Centre

Posted in POLITIC | Leave a comment

JALAN KELUAR UNTUK ANWAR IBRAHIM

There is only one way out for Dato Seri Anwar Ibrahim and to all those who are supporting him. One way out and there is no other ways except that way. Dato Seri Anwar Ibrahim is known as an Islamic political leader who used to stand in the path of promoting Islamic ideas and practices yet trapped along the way with the love of power, wealth and women. No one can claim that they are clean and pure, as all human being are all exposed to the love of wealth and power. When there is no power and wealth, a person may not be tested and they may look clean and pure but when there are given power and wealth, few can remain clean and pure. When Dato Seri Anwar was a young student leader with no power and wealth he was at that time could probably be clean and pure, but now Dato Seri Anwar is not the same Anwar that Datin Seri Wan Azizah knew and get attracted CLICK. All problems that come to us are because of our actions. No problem that has come to us is because of the actions of other peoples. We often blame other peoples for the problems that we have and that is the usual actions taken by most peoples. When we are in the habits of always blaming other peoples, in whatever problems that have happened upon us, it showed that we are the type of a person who put desires as God. When we have made our desires as our God, we always blame others in whatever problem comes to us. We declined to accept the fact that the problems that has come to us is because of our own wrong action. We would point our fingers to others and refused to accept that it is due to our own wrong doings. When we refused to accept the fact the problems that has come to us is the result of our own wrong actions, it showed that our desires has taken the place of our God. Men desires are to be always right and correct and they hate to make any mistakes or any wrong doings. When men are at the lowest level of desires they always think that they are always right and others are always wrong. Most men are in this level of desires and when men’s desires have increased to the next upper level of desires, they start to blame themselves in whatever problems that have come to them. What level of desire are you now?
In my opinion, Dato Seri Anwar Ibrahim is still in the lowest level of desires, the desires similar to the desires of animals. The peoples who belong to this level of desires will always blame others for anything bad that has come to him. Dato Seri Anwar blame our Prime Minister Dato Seri Najib and our former Prime Minister Tun Dr Mahathir for all the bad things that has happen to him. In his recent political lectures to a group of Indians who are his supporters in Klang, Dato Seri Anwar had cursed our Prime Minister and call him by the bad names in Tamil when translated it sounds like the son of a pig. How rude is Anwar and how ill manners is he that he can call our Prime Minister with that names and the Indians who were his audience in the lectures are the same as Anwar, rude and ill manners. When Anwar said that Dato Seri Najib as the son of a pig, so the late Prime Minister who is the late Tun Abdul Razak is also a pig. All of us know that Anwar is not a Malay but he is a Tamil Indians and his forefathers comes from Tamil Nadu, India and they had come to Malaysia as labourers brought down by the British. Some Malay probably get attracted and married to this Indians and down the lineage come Anwar Ibrahim and the family, later on enter the Malay political group known as UMNO. Although they are basically Indians but since they have some Malay blood and they are also Muslims, all the Malay accept them as Malay. Malay is such kind and good hearted races that accept almost everybody to live together in harmony. Malay are willing to accept Anwar Ibrahim as Malay although basically he is Indian and his wife Datin Wan Azizah is an adopted daughter of a Malay family and the real parents of Wan Azizah is also not Malay. In a Malay culture and tradition, no one will ever behave like Anwar, who curse the one that had done favours to him like Tun Dr Mahathir. Malay will get angry but they will keep their anger in their heart and when they cannot stand the anger, they will show amok. It takes time for Malay to perform amok, but when they do, it leads to a real disaster. May 13th, 1969 was one of the days when the Malay show their amok. Anwar, please do not make the Malay angry with you by calling Dato Seri Najib who is legally appointed by the Malay as their leaders as ‘Anak Babi’ and you call him as such in fronts of Indians. Malay who supported Anwar is the same as Anwar and are humiliating their own race by supporting Anwar. Malay have accepted you in UMNO, although all of them knew that you are not Malay and you should guard your mouth and behaviours towards the Malay and their leaders. Let this be a warning to you, Anwar. Actions must be taken against Anwar, for humiliating peoples in public and the one that Anwar had humiliated was none other our Prime Minister and his father who was also the Prime Minister of Malaysia.
All the problems faced by Dato Seri are due to his own wrong doings and not of others. All the problems come from Allah and none who gives him the problems except Allah. Dato Seri Anwar must know that Allah had given him ample times to make taubah or repentance but instead of making repentance Dato Seri Anwar has taken the actions of denying all the allegations that has been made against him. He denied that he was involved in the sodomy case in 1998 and now he denied again and this time a sodomy case with his own personal assistance, Mr Saiful Bahari. Mr Saiful Bahari had admitted that he was being sodomised by Dato Seri Anwar and that he would like to repent from the immoral actions. He resigned from becoming the personal assistance of Anwar because he is not willing to become the sexual victims of Anwar any longer. Mr Saiful Bahari resigned from becoming the personal assistance of Dato Seri Anwar because he does not want to be forced by Anwar into doing the immoral acts. Anwar must have done these unusual sexual habits not once, but several times. I think he must have been doing these unusual sexual habits to so many peoples in the past and for so many years. All these bad actions are recorded by Allah and as years goes by, all these bad actions accumulate to become a mountain of bad action and at that point of time, Allah decided to catch Dato Seri Anwar. The first time Allah decided to catch Anwar was in 1998 and Anwar denied very strongly that he was not involved in sodomy with few of his assistance. Dato Seri Anwar was put in jail for about six years because of misused of power and not because of sodomy. He escaped the charges against sodomy. Recently Dato Seri Anwar is again charged with sodomy case with Mr Saiful. It look as if Anwar is caught by Allah, for the second time and I think this time Anwar will be most likely be found guilty of sodomy. DNA found in the rectum of Mr Saiful match the DNA found in the toothbrush, good morning towel used by Anwar in the jail. I think this time Dato Seri cannot escaped any longer from the charges of sodomy. On top of the sodomy charges, Dato Seri Anwar private lifestyles are also exposed to the public via the exposure of the sex video clips depicting a man very much looks like Anwar having sexual relationship with a prostitute, a Chinese student studying in Malaysia. What was shown in the video clip, if it was Anwar, it must not be the first time Anwar is doing it. Anwar must have been visiting prostitutes quite often and the sins must have been accumulated to the extent that Allah has decided to catch on Anwar. With the release of the video clip, Allah is revealing to the public the true colours of Anwar. Anwar should have admitted that the person in the video clip is him and that he is ready to make repentance to Allah and that he will never do it again. Allah will forgive him and the problems will soon be solved by Allah.
When Tun Dr Mahathir asked him to resign from the post of Deputy Prime Minister, he should have resigned and makes repentance to Allah over all the wrong doings that he has done but instead of repenting, he refused to resigned and started to attack Tun Dr Mahathir. He was thinking the best action to take was to revenge against Tun Dr Mahathir but the more getting even he took; the more did he sink into the wilderness of problems. Anwar thinks he can win over Tun Dr Mahathir but since Anwar was on the wrong path, the more Anwar attacked Tun Dr Mahathir, the more sins Anwar was committing and the more problems Anwar will have to encountered. As Anwar continue to lie to the peoples and all his supporters, the problems faced by Anwar would not be solved by Allah. Anwar knows how to acts in order to look innocent. The way Anwar acts, no one will ever think that he was lying. He will talk with anger over the accusation made towards him and it really looks to most peoples that the accusations made against him is false and it is a conspiracy plan of his political enemies. When Anwar talks, he will talks as if he was on the right track and others who have accused him are on the wrong track.
In case Anwar was on the right side of the story in 1998, Allah must have raised his position in the society. When Anwar was victimised by a conspiracy, Anwar was actually accumulating abundant good deeds. Instead of being elevated by Allah, Anwar is now being degraded by Allah. Anwar is again inflicted with the same court charges of sodomy and more than that Anwar visiting prostitutes for his sexual needs are made known to the whole world through the video clips. Allah made it possible for the video clip to be shown in the internet. Nothing can happen except with the permission of Allah. Allah has degraded the image of Anwar due to his sins and the more sins Anwar is committing the more degradation he will have to face. With the release of the video clips, the real lifestyles of Anwar and who Anwar really was, is made clearer to the public in the whole world. Although the core supporters of Anwar are denying that the person in the video is Anwar but the majority of the public, believe that the person in the video clip is Anwar Ibrahim.
When Anwar is denying it means Anwar is trying to cheat the public. When Anwar is cheating, he is doing a is sinful acts and he is pleased by Allah. Allah hates those who are cheating. The more Anwar is cheating the more sins he will get and the more problems Anwar will have to encounter. Anwar thinks, the more he is denying the truth, the better he will be and the more chance he will have to become the Prime Minister of Malaysia. Anwar will become the Prime Minister of Malaysia when all the allegations made against him are false and Anwar is really the victims of conspiracy of Umno. The more Anwar is victimised the more Allah will love him and the more the prayers of Anwar will be accepted by Allah and by now Anwar will be out from all the problems in no time. But instead of being out of problems, the more Anwar is denying, the more problems Anwar has to face and this shows that Anwar is doing more sins as Anwar is continually denying. This shows that the denying made by Anwar is false. When Anwar keep on making denying, it means Anwar is keep on cheating and the more Anwar cheats, the more problems Anwar will have.
Our problems cannot be solved by committing more sins as sins will bears more problems. When we are doing sinful acts and we are reminded by Allah about it, we must immediately repent or making taubah or asking abundance forgiveness from Allah. Sins can only be clean by repentance or by doing good works and when the sins are forgiven by Allah; our problems that comes with the sins will also go away from us. The only way out for Anwar is to make real repentance known as “Taubatan Nasoha” and not to repeat again those sinful acts that have been done in the past in the future. Allah is most forgiving and none is more forgiving than Allah. With the mistakes Anwar did to Malaysia many in Malaysia do not want to forgive Anwar but Allah will forgive you if you really make the real repentance with sincerity. With all the scandals that are faced by Anwar, even though if it was not true, Anwar cannot become the Prime Minister of Malaysia and Anwar must know the route to Putrajaya is already closed to him. My advice to Dato Seri Anwar is to repent and stop aiming to become Prime Minister of Malaysia. It is not that all important to become the Prime Minister of Malaysia. What is important is Allah is pleased with you and when Dato Seri Anwar can please Allah until Allah is pleased with you, you will become successful in this world and hereafter. Allah love those who are sinful but they make repentance and then do good work ,the work of the Prophet saw and ask all those who support you to also making repentance and do the work of the Prophet saw, as they are also helping you to make sins to Allah.
Prof Dr Nasoha Saabin
May 2011
Integrative Holistic Wellness Centre

Posted in POLITIC | Tagged | Leave a comment

HUKUM ZINA DALAM ISLAM- KES LIWAT DAN ZINA ANWAR IBRAHIM

Sexual intercourse is defined by the act of penetration of the penis or male genital organ into the virginal or anus of a female, the anus of a male or the virginal and the anus of animals, either male of females. Islam allows sexual intercourse to be done lovably between husband and wife. When it is done unlawfully to a woman or to an animal it is call zina. Sexual intercourse that involved the anus of a man or animals are call Liwat and it is also a form of Zina. Zina is not allowed in Islam and those that commit the act of zina can be punished by the Laws of Hudud and Takzir. The laws of Hudud applies when a person who has committed zina in the name of Allah has seriously declared without compulsion before the judge that he or she has committed zina or the acts of zina has been witnessed by four pious and reliable Muslims. Zina performed in this situation warrant the punishment of Hudud Laws. In case the person who has performed zina has not been married, the punishment told by Allah in the Quran is to beat them with 100 canning. In case the person who has performed zina is a married person, the punishments told by Allah in the Quran are to stones his or her to death. A situation where a person himself or herself admits in the name of Allah that he or she commits zina is a very rare situation. It will only happen to those who are very pious and muttaqin. A pious or muttaqin men and women who accidentally involve in the acts of zina will not stay at peace until all his sins are forgiven by Allah in this world. In order for his or her sins to be forgiven in this world, he or she must make sincere repentance before Allah and be punished by the laws of Hudud in this world. Since in our times they are no or rarely any pious or muttaqin peoples, so the chances that a pious and muttaqin person accidentally commits zina and willingly come forward to declare before the judge that he or she commit zina is very slim. Lihat penjelasan oleh Ustaz Kazim Elias Al-Hafiz CLICK
At the time of Prophet Muhammad saw, there is one married lady but pious and muttaqin who accidentally involved in the acts of zina. She comes forward to declare before the Prophet Muhammad saw that she had committed zina or adultery and she requested the Prophet saw to perform the laws of Hudud upon her. Prophet Muhammad saw advised her to go home and get the baby delivered and only after the baby had been delivered, the Prophet advised her to come back to Prophet saw. When the baby had been delivered, as promised, she go back to the Prophet Muhammad saw with the baby in her hand and reminded the Prophet Muhammad saw about the punishment of Hudud to be imposed upon her. Once again Prophet Muhammad saw asked the lady to go back to her homes and fed the newly born baby with her milk and only then, to come back to the Prophet saw for the punishment. When the baby was reasonably aging and had been able to eat other foods other than milk, the lady went back to Prophet Muhammad saw with her baby holding a piece of bread in her mouth. Only after this time did the Prophet saw performed the punishment of Hudud on her. During the stoning ceremony of the lady, there is blood being splashed on the body of one of the companions, who remarked that the blood is a dirty blood that comes from the body of dirty woman. On hearing the remarks made by the companions, Prophet Muhammad saw said with the approximate meaning, don’t you ever speak like that to her, she had made repentance and her repentance is so pure and sincere and in case the repentance were to be distributed to the whole peoples of Hijaz, it would be sufficient to save all of them from the Hell. Prophet Muhammad saw further said to the companions that, I am seeing her swimming in the rivers of Heaven. In my opinion, this situation whereby the person herself or himself willingly comes forward to admit that they are committing zina is the situation not to be found any longer nowadays.
The situation where we have to have four witness of pious and reliable person that saw with their own naked eyes a person committing zina is also a situation very hard to find not only during our time but also during the time of the Prophet and the companions. It has never been reported at the times of the Prophet Muhammad saw and the four righteous caliphs that such incidence ever happened and what more during this time of ours. A person who is committing zina among pious and reliable persons is the situation very difficult to find unless acts of zina is performed in the mosques or in a gathering of pious and reliable peoples. A person who is doing the acts of zina among the pious and reliable Muslims is a very bad, highly immoral and animalistic character type of a person. No one who has even a tint of moral would ever do such acts in the midst of pious and reliable Muslims. A person who dared to commit zina in the midst of pious and reliable Muslims is a very bad, highly immoral, and animalistic in character, and the punishment that is suitable to that person in that situation is the punishment of Hudud. Hudud punishment would be suitable to that person who commits acts of zina in the midst of pious and reliable Muslims. In case they are married, they have to be stone to death. In case they are still singles they have to be canned by 100 canning. Hudud punishment will also acts as deterrent to the pious and reliable Muslims who saw the acts of zina being performed. A pious Muslim can be defined by a Muslims who daily do the work of the Prophet and perform five times prayers with congregation, performing of fast in the month of Ramadan, giving of alms to the poor and performing pilgrimage to Mecca CLICK. A person who is committing zina among pious and reliable Muslims must be a person who is not having any iman but pretending to have iman and is trying to cover up his bad natures and characters by mingling with the pious and reliable Muslims. The act of zina witness by pious and reliable Muslims is most likely the act of zina performed with another men or animals. Acts of zina that involved women would not be witness by four pious and reliable Muslims as pious and reliable Muslims do not sit and mingle in gatherings with impious women. Four people who sneak into a room or peak through a hole in the wall of the room and saw zina being performed inside the room are not pious and reliable Muslims and they cannot become the four witnesses in the law of Hudud. In order to have four witnesses of reliable and pious Muslims to see acts of zina being performed by their naked eyes is almost an impossible situation to find. In case there is, the punishment of Hudud has to be performed on those persons who perform the acts of zina.
Many Muslims who are sensible and having at least a tint of moral but with little or no iman will do the acts of zina in a closed room or house. Many Muslims with weak iman will do the acts of zina but they will never disclose it to anyone and what more to declare it to the judge and being punished with the Hudud laws. Couples who commit zina in the car and being caught right handed by Pegawai Pencegah Maksiat cannot be charged with Hudud laws because in most cases are only caught by one Pegawai and the Pegawai is also not pious and reliable. In order for the punishment of Hudud laws to be applied on the couples, four pious and reliable Muslims should be watching the actual act of penetration of the men’s penis into the women’s virginal. Can we imagine such situation will ever exist in Malaysia or in any Muslims countries? It is most unlikely to happen and the probability that at one time four pious and reliable Muslims are watching an acts of sexual intercourse being done openly by a Muslim couples is very slim. In other words, the chances that Hudud laws would be applied will be very rare. Many Muslims will do the acts of zina in a closed room or house and none except both of them know that they are doing the acts of zina. When both of them are grown up adults and do the acts of zina willingly, none will ever know that they have performed the acts of zina unless the women has become pregnant. In this case there are no four pious and reliable Muslims watching the couples doing the acts of zina and acts as the witness for the case, but there are evidences to support the accusation that the acts of zina has been committed by the woman, the evidence is the woman has become pregnant. We can use DNA of the baby conceived by the lady and the DNA of the man accused of doing the act of zina as evidence. When there is a match in the DNA, judges can use the evidence to charge beyond doubt that the man had committed zina. The case cannot come under the law of Hudud but it can come under the law of Tak’zir. The persons of the zina will be punished according to the verdict of the judges and not by the laws of Hudud. Under certain circumstances the judge may even pass a death penalty to those who perform zina.
In other words, Malaysia can practice Islamic laws as in most cases of her criminal cases that involve zina. I think, in most criminal cases that involve zina it only require the application of the law of Tak’zir. It is very unlikely that Hudud laws are applied in many criminal cases that involve zina in Malaysia. In my opinion, I think there will be no one in Malaysia who has the strength of iman to be able, to admit in the name of Allah, that they have done zina and that, they personally request for the application of Hudud laws on them. Secondly in Malaysia, it would be almost impossible to obtain four witnesses in any criminal cases that involve zina, who are pious and reliable Muslims. In my opinion, most if not all cases of criminal cases that involve zina needs only the application of the laws of Tak’zir where judgements are only made by the judges on the basis of the availability of evidences such as DNA and others and not the laws of Hudud.
In the case of Dato’ Seri Anwar Ibrahim CLICK and Mr Saiful Bukhari, we cannot used the punishment of Hudud on Dato’ Seri Anwar because we cannot have four pious and reliable witnesses on the case but we can use the punishment of the laws of Tak’zir, whereby the punishments are being decided by the judges base on the evidences available. Since the DNA found in the rectum of Mr Saiful Bukhari match the DNA found in the towels and toothbrush use by Dato’ Seri Anwar when he was in the lockup, so the evidences available strongly suggest beyond any doubt to the judge, that Dato’Seri Anwar had ejaculated his semen into the rectum of Mr Saiful Bukhari, which in other words, Dato Seri Anwar has done zina. Base on this evidences, the judge on his discretion can give the form of punishment seems suitable to Dato’ Seri Anwar. In this case we cannot use Hudud Laws to punish Dato Seri Anwar because we do not have four pious and reliable witnesses, but Dato Seri Anwar can be punished under the laws of Tak’zir. Laws of Tak’zir and Hudud are two different forms of punishments, with the laws of Hudud as punishment directly come from Allah, and the laws of Tak’zir as punishments decided by the judges when there are no four pious and reliable witnesses and no self-admittance on the part of the accused or the doer but there are evidences available to suggest that zina had been committed. Why do Dato Seri Anwar Ibrahim, PAS leaders and PAS members are screaming for four pious and reliable witnesses? In case there are no four pious and reliable witnesses, under the Islamic laws, Dato Seri Anwar can still be charged for zina in the court when there are evidences available. When Siti Zulaika was trying to seduce Nabi Yusuf, there were no four pious and reliable witnesses but there are evidences available to suggest to the judge that it was Siti Zulaika who was trying to seduce Nabi Yusuf and not vice versa. The evidence was the torn on the cloth of Nabi Yusuf was at the back of the cloth and not in the front. Why do PAS CLICK leaders are telling lies to the public that to pass judgements and punishments by using only evidences are not Islamic? PAS leaders with their Islamic colours are lying to the Muslims that In Islam there is only Hudud Laws. They say, if there are no four reliable and pious Muslims as witnesses, the case is regarded as null and void. PAS want to tell to the world that in Islamic jurisdictions, other evidences are not important and if the judgements are pass by the judge without having four pious and reliable witnesses, the judgement is not Islamic. PAS is telling too mush lies to the Muslims in Malaysia and I think they must make repentance CLICK and start telling the truth to the peoples, before Almighty Allah, takes action on them.
Prof Dr Nasoha Saabin
June 2011
Integrative Holistic Wellness Centre

Posted in POLITIC | Tagged | Leave a comment

HUDUD LAWS IS ICON OF PAS

HUDUD LAWS are so synonymous with PAS especially before PAS form a coalition party with DAP. The party has been propagating the inception of Hudud Laws in Malaysia since the day the party was born. PAS leaders over decades have been championing the inception of Hudud laws in Malaysia. They make fiery lectures on this issue and they accused those who are not supporting or antagonizing their struggle as infidels of kafir. UMNO members and the supporters of UMNO has been the traditional enemies of PAS and the enmity between them sometimes goes to the extent such as they cannot married with each other. In case they have been married, PAS issues a fatwa that the marriage is invalid and has to be remarried using PAS scholar or ustaz. The action gets even more extreme when they will have to divorce either the husband or the wife who is the members of UMNO. PAS leaders particularly Tuan Guru Hadi Awang was very vocal on this issue and because of this especially in the 90’s, PAS members will not pray behind an iman appointed by the government led by UMNO and PAS members will not attend the funeral and marriage ceremony of UMNO members and their supporters. In the states of Terengganu and Kelantan, the enmity between UMNO and PAS even goes to the extent that PAS members will not perform their prayers in mosque built by the government led by UMNO. In those states, PAS members will build their own mosque or surau and PAS members will only attend the mosque and surau only. PAS leaders are so convinced that to become the members of UMNO and to support UMNO in the election will make them become infidels and all infidels will be burnt in the hellfire. The poor illiterate and ignorant Muslims of Kelantan and Terengganu are so naives and sincere. Who can they believes? They have to believe the learned Islamic scholars such as Tuan Guru Haji Hadi who has graduated from the most famous Islamic University of Al-Azhar in Cairo. They believe whatever their learned Muslim scholars tell them. The common Muslims particularly in Kelantan and Terengganu have learned to admire, to respect and to listen to the Ulama from the days they were young. The common Muslims in these states are not to be blamed if they have the wrong understanding about Islam but the person to be blamed are the learned personalities of PAS, particularly Tuan Guru Nik Aziz and Tuan Guru Haji Hadi.
UMNO does not seem to have the Ulama who have the capability to counter the allegation of PAS. When PAS made the allegation that UMNO and their supporters are infidels or kafir, the Ulama in UMNO remain silence or in case they speak out they will be label by the Ulama of PAS as Ulama Dunia or Ulama who works only to gain worldly things. With the tarnish image that the Ulama in UMNO has, they seem to have no power to counter the allegation of PAS. UMNO members particularly the former President of UMNO, Tun Dr Mahathir was very angry with PAS allegation that UMNO members are kafir. Since the image of Tun Dr Mahathir was painted by PAS as worldly person who does not know about Islam, most people particularly PAS members will pay no attention whatever to any comment given by Tun Dr Mahathir towards PAS. When peoples compare the Islamic image of the PAS Ulama and Tun Dr Mahathir, they will rather believe PAS Ulama rather than Tun Dr Mahathir. Many years have passed and the conflict between PAS and UMNO never end. Malays in Malaysia are divided and they were united only once and that was during the time of the late Tun Abdul Razak, the second Prime Minister of Malaysia. The major reasons why Malays are divided are political. Since recent years the division between Malays widen especially with the emergence of the new political party under Dato’ Seri Anwar Ibrahim by the name of PKR. In my opinion, only when there is no political party in Malaysia, the Malays will be united. The conflict between the Malays have drained all our energies that otherwise should be used to make Malaysia an advanced and progressive nation. Malays are the dominant race in Malaysia, the success of this race will become the foundation and the basis of success for Malaysia and similarly the failure of this race will become the catalyst of catastrophe for Malaysia as a nation. Whoever love Malaysia and want to live in peace and harmony in Malaysia must work together toward unity of the Malays.
Since PAS join PKR and DAP, PAS is no longer using the slogan of Hudud Laws in Malaysia as their main slogan. PAS change her strategy by using the slogan of ‘Negara Berkebajikan’. No more Hudud Laws in the speeches of PAS leaders and they are trying to rebrand PAS as a party which take cares about the welfare of all the peoples. In this way, PAS will be able to attract the non-Muslims to be her members. Now many Malays Muslims are convinced that the slogan of Hudud laws is only a political slogan and PAS is not really serious in adopting Hudud laws in Malaysia. Moreover, PAS has joined with DAP who hates Hudud Laws to the core of their heart. No more talks about Hudud laws which PAS has used it as their main slogan for nearly 50 years. Why the sudden change of slogan? Many PAS members believe that it is only a strategy of PAS. PAS has to change the slogan in order to be with the other two parties who have the same intention or niat which is to topple Barisan National. Because the intention of PAS is to topple Barisan National and not to uphold the Laws of Allah in Malaysia, PAS is willing to change its slogan which has been used by PAS for more than five decades. It is clear that the aim of the struggle of PAS is only to topple Barisan National and to have power to rule Malaysia but the naïve and the ignorant Malay Muslims will not be able to understand this. PAS will tell the common naïve Malay Muslims that we need the power to rule Malaysia so that we can establish the Laws of Allah, particularly the Hudud Laws. PAS will tell the common Malays Muslim that we still have our original aim, to establish Hudud Laws but because we want power then we must work together even with the kafir in order to topple UMNO which is the leaders of the government of thagut and batil.

Can we believe that PAS will establish Hudud Laws, once PAS has the power to rule Malaysia? Will the other associates of PAS allow PAS to established Hudud Laws in Malaysia? Do PAS really know how to establish an Islamic state? Do Tuan Guru Haji Hadi and Nik Abdul Aziz know how to establish an Islamic state? Or they only want an Islamic state but they are not sure how to start it. I think PAS only want an Islamic state but they do not know how to start doing it. In case PAS has the power to rule Malaysia, will they start with the implementation of Hudud Laws? If they do, there will be a disaster and chaos in the country. When was the Prophet saw started his dakwah to establish the orders of Allah? What was the first order of Allah he wanted to establish? And what was the second order of Allah he wanted to establish? The first order of Allah that the Prophet saw wanted to establish was not the order of implementing Hudud Laws but to establish the order of whom has recited and accepted the Great Kalimah which in the first of the five pillars of Islam to convey or to deliver the Great Kalimah to those who have not recited the Great Kalimah or we call it dakwah to the none-muslim like his companions had done in Mecca before the second order of Allah revealed during Israk-Mikraj. The second order of Allah that the Prophet saw was asked by Allah to establish was the order of performing the five daily prayers. The orders to establish Hudud Laws came in Medina and it came towards the end of the revelation years. Should all the learned personalities of PAS know about this? Do they know what is the first priority of orders of Allah to be established. They know, but they are not given the correct understanding by Allah on how to implement the orders of Allah the way Allah wants, and the way Allah want is the way of Prophet Muhammad saw. The learned personalities of PAS were not given the understanding of Quran by Allah because they love the worldly materials and they love the power that enables them to rule Malaysia. Because they love worldly things, Allah takes away from their heart the love of Islam. When they do not love Islam, they do not want to do the work of inviting people to good and forbidding peoples from evils the way the Prophet saw did, that is by going to meet the peoples either Muslims or non-Muslims from house to house and from person to person. When they do not want to do the work of the Prophet saw, Allah takes away from them the blessing of the revelation or the understanding of the Quran. When Islamic scholars are contented with only giving lectures in the mosques and in the ijtima, they will be deprived from the correct understanding of the Quran. The Islamic scholars will make interpretation of the Quran by using only their minds and they will not be guided by Allah. When many Islamic scholars make their own interpretation, there will be many groups of Muslims and each group will say that they are on the correct path and the others are on the wrong path. Prophet Muhammad saw said in the approximate meaning, that my Umat is divided into 73 groups and all are deviated except one. When asked by his companions, which is the one that is on the correct path? Prophet saw remarked that the one who is on the correct path is the one who follows my companions and me.
Actually, PAS is not Islam and Islam is not PAS. In reality PAS is a political party with an Islamic image that want to establish an Islamic state but they do not have the correct understanding on how to establish an Islamic state nor they have the qualities of Islamic leadership. In case PAS rule Malaysia and they implement the Hudud Laws, there will chaos and instability in Malaysia similar to what has happened to Afghanistan when Taliban took over to manage the country. I guess many PAS members may not agree with me but it is natural that if anyone blocks his or her mind into something and nothing else, they will not be ready to think of any alternatives.
Prof Dr Nasoha Saabin
April 2011
Integrative Holistic Wellness Centre

Posted in POLITIC | Tagged | Leave a comment